A study looking at screening for men who are at an increased risk of developing prostate cancer (IMPACT)

Cancer type:

Prostate cancer

Status:

Results

Phase:

Other

This study was done to find out more about screening for men who have an increased risk of prostate cancer because they have a change in a specific gene.

It was open for people to join between 2005 and 2020. The team published some results in 2019 and 2021.

More about this trial

When this study was done, research had already shown that men who have inherited certain genetic changes (mutations) have an increased risk of developing prostate cancer. This includes changes in genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Research had also suggested that men may have an increased risk if they have a change in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. This group of genes includes MSH2, MSH6 and MLH1. 

A condition called Lynch syndrome is caused by these genetic changes. Lynch syndrome can increase the risk of various cancers, including prostate cancer.

The PSA blood test is one of the tests used to help diagnose prostate cancer in people who are having symptoms. It is not reliable enough to be used as a screening test for all men. Screening means testing people for early stage cancer before they have symptoms. 

The study team wanted to find out if the PSA test was useful for men with a genetic change that increased their risk of prostate cancer. Men with and without certain genetic changes took part in this study. The research team compared the results from all the different groups.

The main aim of the study was to find out if a PSA blood test could be used to help diagnose prostate cancer in men with a genetic change.
 

Summary of results

The research team found that the PSA blood test may be useful to help diagnose prostate cancer in men with some genetic changes.

Study design
This study was for men who hadn’t been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Some people taking part had changes in certain genes, and some didn’t.  

The genes the research team were interested in were:

  • BRCA1
  • BRCA2
  • MLH1
  • MSH2
  • MSH6

The men taking part have a PSA blood test once a year for at least 5 years. 

If their PSA level was greater than 3.0 nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml), they could have a biopsy to check for cancer cells.

If their PSA level was less than or equal to 3.0 ng/ml, they didn’t have any more tests until the PSA test the following year.

The research team looked at various things for each group, including the number of men who:

Results

Results for BRCA 1 and BRCA2 genes
Around 3,000 men joined this part of the study between 2005 and 2013:

  • 919 had a BRCA1 gene change
  • 709 didn’t have a BRCA1 gene change
  • 902 had a BRCA2 gene change
  • 497 didn’t have a BRCA2 gene change

 


In 2019, the research team published some results for this part of the study. The results were for people having their 4th annual PSA test. 

They found that, in total:

  • 527 men had had a PSA level greater than 3.0ng/ml  
  • 357 men had had a prostate biopsy
  • 112 men had been diagnosed with prostate cancer 

They looked at the number of men in each group who had prostate cancer. 

They found there wasn’t much difference between those who had a BRCA1 gene change and those who didn’t:

  • 31 out of 919 men (3.4%) who had a BRCA1 gene change
  • 19 out of 709 men (2.7%) who didn’t have a BRCA1 gene change

But there was a bit more of a difference between those who had BRCA2 gene change and those who didn’t:

  • 47 out of 902 men (5.2%) who had a BRCA2 gene change
  • 15 out of 497 men (3.0%) who didn’t have a BRCA2 gene change

They looked at the number of men whose prostate cancer was intermediate or high risk. It was higher in those who had a BRCA gene change than those who didn’t. And the average age at diagnosis was lower in these men.

Results for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 genes
Around 1,000 men joined this part of the study between 2012 and 2020:

  • 204 had an MLH1 gene change
  • 199 didn’t have an MLH1 gene change
  • 305 had an MSH2 gene change
  • 210 didn’t have an MSH2 gene change
  • 135 had an MSH6 gene change
  • 177 didn’t have an MSH6 gene change

 


In 2021, the team published some results for this part of the study. The results were for people having their first annual PSA test. 

They found that, in total:

  • 56 men had a PSA level greater than 3.0ng/ml  
  • 35 men had a biopsy
  • 18 men had been diagnosed with prostate cancer

They looked at the number of people in each group who had been diagnosed with prostate cancer. 

They found that no one with an MLH1 gene change (or the group who didn’t have an MLH1 gene change) had prostate cancer. 

But there was a difference between those who had an MSH2 gene change, and those who didn’t:

  • 13 out of 305 men (4.3%) who had an MSH2 gene change
  • 1 out of 210 men (0.5%) who didn’t have an MSH2 gene change

And a difference between those who had an MSH6 gene change, and those who didn’t:

  • 4 out of 135 men (3.0%) who had an MSH6 gene change
  • None of the 177 men who didn’t have an MSH6 gene change


They also looked at the number of men who had intermediate or high risk prostate cancer. It was higher in those with a genetic change. And the average age at diagnosis was lower in these men.

Conclusion
The study team concluded that annual PSA tests may help diagnose prostate cancer in men with changes in the BRCA2, MSH2 or MSH6 genes. 

It is hard to draw firm conclusions because of the small number of people diagnosed with prostate cancer. This is especially true for the MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 groups who had only had one PSA test when these results were published.

The team suggest that regular PSA testing should be considered for men with these gene changes. This is called targeted screening. But they need the results of further annual PSA tests before they can say for sure whether targeted screening will be useful for these men. 

In 2020, The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommended that men with a BRCA2 gene change should have an annual PSA tests. 

Future results
The study team continue to follow up the men who took part in this study. They plan to publish further results about diagnosing prostate cancer earlier, to assess if using a PSA test affects how long people live.

Where this information comes from    
We have based this summary on information from the research team. The information they sent us has been reviewed by independent specialists (peer reviewed Open a glossary item) and published in a medical journal. The figures we quote above were provided by the trial team who did the research. We have not analysed the data ourselves.

Recruitment start:

Recruitment end:

How to join a clinical trial

Please note: In order to join a trial you will need to discuss it with your doctor, unless otherwise specified.

Please note - unless we state otherwise in the summary, you need to talk to your doctor about joining a trial.

Chief Investigator

Professor R. Eeles

Supported by

Cancer Research UK
The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR)
NIHR Clinical Research Network: Cancer -The Biomedical Research Centre grant to ICR and RMH
The Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RMH)
BRCA Research & Cure Alliance

If you have questions about the trial please contact our cancer information nurses

Freephone 0808 800 4040

Last review date

CRUK internal database number:

235

Please note - unless we state otherwise in the summary, you need to talk to your doctor about joining a trial.

Last reviewed:

Rate this page:

Currently rated: 1.5 out of 5 based on 2 votes
Thank you!
We've recently made some changes to the site, tell us what you think